Notes on: Birthrights (ND) . Systemic racism,
not broken bodies. An inquiry into racial
injustice and human rights in UK maternity care.
Avaialble from
https://www.birthrights.org.uk/campaigns-research/racial-injustice/
Dave Harris
The foreword by the inquiry co-chair relates that
black and brown women do not feel safe when
accessing maternity care and that this cannot be
understood without grasping racism and bias in the
healthcare system, which had 'a massive impact on
my journey… I was stereotyped and felt like I had
to suffer in silence after repeatedly raising
concerns then being ignored'. The other inquiry
co-chair says in her foreword that the usual
explanations mention socio-economic deprivation
and comorbidities but these should be seen as
added factors affecting the training of staff,
really just the straw that broke the camel's back.
The report drew upon 'hundreds of black, brown and
mixed ethnicity women, birthing people and
healthcare professionals'. They also ran focus
groups and interviews with midwives and health
care professionals. They had an initial scoping
and evidence review, then some interviews with
LGBTQ + birthing people. They rooted this work in
'antiracist principles and practice. They work
widely with other organisations and foundations
including legal ones.
In 2018, the MBRRACE report found that black women
were five times and Asian women twice more likely
to die in the perinatal period than white women.
These trends continued for decades. They are also
more likely to experience baby loss, become
seriously ill and have worse experiences of care.
Black and brown bodies have often been seen as the
problem 'regarding them as "defective", "other",
and a risk' (9). They insist instead that
'systemic racism exists in the UK and in public
services'and set out to see how it manifested
itself and how to end it. They heard testimony
from women, birthing people, professionals and
lawyers and focused on systemic racism in
individual interactions, workforce culture,
curriculums and policies. An expert panel brought
together this lived experience, maternity care and
legal knowledge. They had 'in-depth testimony from
over 300 people' following an online call for
evidence, focus groups and interviews, from
professional clinical bodies, experts and various
women and other birthing people.
The common themes that emerged were: 'lack of
physical and psychological safety; being ignored
and disbelieved; racism by caregivers;
dehumanisation; lack of choice, consent and
coercion; structural barriers; workforce
representation and culture' (10) [spelled-out
later]. Calls for action follow: the maternity
system should 'commit to be an antiracist
organisation; decolonising maternity curriculums
and guidance; make black and brown women and
birthing people decision-makers in their care;
create a safe inclusive workforce cultures;
dismantle structural barriers to racial equality
through national policy change'. Definitions
follow, referring to inclusive language, hence
'birthing people', defining the various ethnic
categories using the same definitions on the
census, but also calling for evidence from people
that are not specified in census categories 'e.g.
Somali, Thai, Vietnamese, mixed black and Asian;
and from people who may identify primarily by
their faith e.g.: black, Asian and Arab
Muslims'(11). Somalis are promptly included in
black, however brown include Asians and Latin
Americans.
They used the MacPherson definition of
institutional racism — the collective failure of
an organisation to provide an appropriate and
professional service to people because of their
colour, culture or ethnic origin. They want to
broaden it to refer to systemic racism because
they have gathered evidence to show that racism
goes beyond single institutions 'and infects
national systems, policies and attitudes' (13). We
need to understand the 'long history of
dehumanisation of black and brown people in the
UK… People who have been perceived by white
societies being subhuman… Black women
specifically'. They were subject to particular
forms of abuse in healthcare settings, medical
experimentation without consent and forced
sterilisation, and '"the medical model that exists
in maternity care today was built on this
patriarchal, white supremacist framework"'
(quoting Roberts 1997) [bold assertion]. This
persists in treating black and brown people as
outside the normal where normal is whiteness. This
affects, for example, access to and provision of
healthcare. It affects maternity care in ways
which threaten basic human rights to 'safety
dignity and autonomy and equality'.
Systemic racism is found in four categories:
Individual
interactions — being ignored and disbelieved,
experiencing stereotypes and micro-aggressions,
being dehumanised, denied pain relief.
Education and training —
white bodies as the normal default, failure to
recognise conditions like jaundice or sepsis,
lack of cultural understanding
Policies and frameworks —
ethnicity as grounds for induction within
policies, high risk pathways based on ethnicity
alone, lack of representation in clinical
evidence and committees, NHS charging regime and
failures to provide interpreting services
Workforce — lack of senior
representation, higher rates of disciplinary
action, bullying and toxic culture
The remedies in each case is a commitment to be an
antiracist organisation, making black and brown
women decision-makers, decolonising maternity
curriculums and dismantling structural barriers
[charging regimes and interpreting] while creating
workplace cultures that are safe. (14)
This follows from applying the Human Rights Act
[not really CRT then] and human rights law [which
already apparently means that 'the person giving
birth is the primary decision-maker in their
care' (15)] [further implications from
articles and humans rights legislations follow].
The existing evidence already shows persistent
racial inequalities in birth outcomes and
experiences in the UK. The panel also reviewed US
data. Statistical research informed the use of
qualitative methodology 'to gather the stories
behind the statistics and address gaps in the
evidence'(17).
There are consistently higher death rates for
black brown and mixed ethnicity women compared to
white women. Overall death rates in pregnancy and
childbirth are relatively low in the UK 'fewer
than one in 10,000 pregnancies' but there are
persistent and significant racial inequalities.
The most recent MBRRACE Report in 2021 shows a
continued gap between mortality rates, with black
ethnic groups four times more likely to die than
women from white groups, Asian and mixed ethnicity
groups twice as likely. The slight drop in
maternal mortality rate for black women 'was not
statistically significant' and the picture is not
changing over 10 years. Further inequalities arose
between women born outside the UK and those born
in the UK. Women born in Nigeria had the highest
maternal mortality rate. Heart disease was the
leading cause of death, followed by epilepsy and/,
sepsis, and blood clots during or up to 6 weeks
after the end of pregnancy.
[This is an interesting cause of death -- the
factors mentioned below attributed to lack of care
cover things like jaundice {for kids}, blood clots
and sepsis but do not even mention heart disease]
The women who died 'faced a "constellation of
biases" which prevented them from receiving the
care they needed'. There were overlapping factors
— 'being from an ethnic minority group,
socio-economic deprivation, social services
involvement, language difficulties, mental
ill-health, obesity, domestic abuse' which
increased the impact of 'the structural and
cultural biases women experience in pregnancy'
(17) [but from whom? Men in their own cultures?
MBRRACE doesn't seem to blame the NHS].
Similar racial inequalities exist with infant
birth outcomes in 2021 — '"exceptionally high for
babies of black and black British ethnicity"'
(MBRRACE), stillbirth rates over twice those who
are white babies, neonatal mortality rates 43%
higher. Asian and Asian British stillbirth and
neonatal mortality rates 60% higher than for white
babies. The overall stillbirth rates have been
reduced between 2013 and 2018, but are falling
more slowly and an ethnic minority babies compared
to white babies so 'initiatives to reduce baby
loss are "failing to reach many women from higher
risk ethnicities"' [again not exactly blaming
racism in the NHS, is it?] (18).
There are further inequalities. Infant mortality
rate was highest among babies with Pakistani
ethnicity, and one study (2009) showed that
Pakistani infants of Pakistani born mothers have a
lower risk of neonatal and infant death than those
born to UK born Pakistani mothers [that is odd].
Caribbean and Pakistani babies were more than
twice as likely than white British babies to die
before the age of one and the multiple complex
factors cited by the study included 'the impact of
systemic racism... On both health outcomes and
maternity care experiences', although it noted
that 'empirical work on the impact of racism… Is
lacking' despite a number of US studies reporting
positive association between perceived racism and
both preterm delivery and low birthweight'.
Black and Asian women are at higher risk of
illness during pregnancy, and the pandemic has
exposed and exacerbated these tendencies — black
pregnant women eight times and Asian women four
times more likely to be admitted to hospital with
covid compared to white women in 2020. Again this
is attributed by Public Health England to a
combination of 'structural racism, socio-economic
disadvantage, housing challenges and occupation
(frontline care, retail, transport)' (19). The
Royal College of Midwives notes that
'socio-economic disadvantage and being from a BAME
background are closely associated with higher
prevalence of obesity, diabetes, hypertension and
cardio metabolic complications' which increase the
risks of both Covid and pregnancy, although an
MBRRACE review doubted those links, and other
studies have also concluded that poverty does not
explain maternal health inequalities between
ethnic groups, nor does age and socio-economic
status. Reduced access to or delays in care 'are
all the more concerning' given that we do know
there is a relation between some conditions and
specific ethnic communities, such as sickle cell
anaemia or thalassaemia.
Postnatal depression and anxiety are higher in
black Asian and mixed ethnicity women, while rates
of access to perinatal mental health services are
lower in women and birthing people from those
groups. (19).
There are studies reporting that women in all
minority ethnic groups had a poorer experience of
maternity services than white women, with more
worries about labour and birth, related to pain,
uncertainty about duration and possible medical
interventions. A 2010 survey of 24,300 women found
significant differences in care, relating
'directly to basic human rights' (20). Black and
brown women face more barriers to access and
choice and were treated with less dignity and
respect. They were less likely to be involved in
decisions to give birth at home or in a birth
centre or to receive pain relief and were more
likely to be offered emergency cesarean. MBRRACE
found they faced delayed or reduced access to care
and this played a role in maternal deaths — nine
out of 10 Nigerian women who died received
antenatal care but only one at the recommended
level. In another report maternity care was
variable and many had minimal or delayed inputs.
American studies show that racism directly impacts
through stereotyping which influences diagnosis
and treatment options including pain management
and communication gaps affecting medical history
details and monitoring. This 'creates a cycle
where black and brown people avoid interactions
with healthcare professionals through fear of
potential prejudice and discrimination' or fear of
being stereotyped, and are less likely to share
information or follow advice.
American literature also points to the historical
roots of gynaecology in the experimentation and
forced procedures on enslaved black women [Dr J
Marion Sims is mentioned, although he has recently
been defended]. Racist views about black people in
pain still persist in 2016 among white medical
students attributing them to biological
differences, although, 'there is far less UK
research on racism within healthcare'.
Nevertheless the Royal College of Obstetricians
and Gynaecologists said in 2020 that racial bias
can hinder consultations affect treatment options
and result in black Asian and minority ethnic
women avoiding interactions, and the Race and
Health Observatory noted women's experiences of
'negative interactions, stereotyping, disrespect,
discrimination and cultural insensitivity'which
led to some ethnic minority women feeling othered,
unwelcome and poorly cared for. Another report in
2020 described racism and stereotyping in NHS
maternity care, reporting 'a common midwifery and
obstetric perspective that '"Asian women have a
shorter perineum"' assuming the anatomy as
compared to some "white norm"', and reporting that
some 'non-BAME maternity staff… [act]… On the
mistaken belief that black women have a higher
pain threshold than other women [this seems to be
drawn from the experiences of ethnic minority NHS
staff in maternity services]. There are other UK
studies finding that 'midwives stereotypically
view Asian women as needing less support, being
generally well supported by their families, having
a lower pain threshold in labour and a tendency to
"make a fuss about nothing", and being too
demanding '(22).
There are other compounding factors including age,
disability, language and migrant status. For
example NHS charging rules can deter undocumented
migrant women from accessing care. In America,
perceptions of race and mental capacity intersect
to reduce black and brown women's autonomy — in
one case a woman was forced to have a cesarean
against her will and racism was alleged to be a
factor. Religious discrimination might be a factor
for Moslem women who also can face stereotypical
and discriminatory behaviour, lack of awareness
and understanding of Islam and with visible
clothing which opens them to discrimination.
Muslim Somali women have reported that 'they are
repeatedly asked if they have experienced female
genital mutilation… Which can be insensitive,
intrusive and re-traumatising' (23) [but still
relevant?]
Gender identity is still underresearched and we
don't know how many deaths include trans men and
non-binary people. Trans men do experience some of
the greatest health disparities and unequal
treatment when accessing healthcare in general,
and '"trans-phobia and racism in perinatal care
intersect"' to affect 'trans and non-binary
birthing parents of colour"' (23).
National initiatives addressing racial
inequalities have had little impact because mostly
they have overlooked the role of systematic racism
or have perpetuated the view that black and brown
bodies of the problem. For example they are
focused on the roll-out of continuity of care but
not on antiracism and cultural safety training.
They have focused on equity, but have not set
targets to reduce disparities for black women, or
identify the sources of 'oppressions in maternity
care experiences and outcomes' (25). Most of the
recommendations face on obvious 'preconceptions of
health or pre-existing conditions' like smoking or
diabetes, and although this is welcome, it still
risks blaming black and brown bodies. What is
still missing is 'reference to the important
concept of "weathering" — the lifetime impact of
every day racial trauma and discrimination on
health, including on pre-existing conditions'
(25). This can lead to a breakdown of trust and
poor interactions with services.
There is apparently an independent NHS Race and
Health Observatory which has recommended tackling
racist attitudes and behaviours among healthcare
staff. The Royal College of Midwives has also
called for improvements in midwifery education so
that midwives are better able to assess darker
skin tones as part of a move to decolonise the
curriculum. But there are wider structural issues,
including chronic underfunding and staff
shortages, which themselves have 'led to
preventable deaths of women and babies' (28) a
particular report focusing on the experiences of
black brown and mixed ethnicity maternity staff
said they felt particularly scared anxious and
worried about their own health, did not feel safe
or supported at work, or supported by management,
face the lack of personal protective equipment and
acknowledgement of psychological impact and 'did
not feel they were able to raise concerns for fear
of retribution'(28). This looks like systemic
dysfunction which is likely to have a
disproportionate impact on marginalised groups
again.
The panel adopted a qualitative methodology for
evidence gathering 'rooted in the trauma informed
approach' [for focus groups]. They held three oral
evidence sessions, advised by 'Nova Reid (31) the
acclaimed writer, speaker and antiracism expert'.
There is also a poll with a sample of 1069
respondents, comparing the experiences of minority
ethnic and white women. The findings appear in the
form of anonymous quotes from respondents to the
call for evidence or participants in focus groups
and interviews. Over 300 people replied, with 14
in-depth interviews, including three LGBTQ+
birthing people. The sample of people giving
evidence were dominated by black African, black
Caribbean, and the healthcare professionals
likewise. White people on their own do not appear
as a separate category at all in those
giving evidence, and but are 24% of the healthcare
professionals [there are some mixed white and
black Caribbean, white and black African,
white and Asian together making up 15% of the
people giving evidence, and a further 19% of
health professionals].
The oral evidence sessions were closed and
detailed transcripts were not published. The main
evidence was summarised and rendered in the form
of anonymous quotes produced [selected?] by
members of the expert panel. Nova Reid and others
ensured 'we applied an antiracist framework to
discussions and conclusions' (35).
Six case studies werer considered from a range of
ethnicities. The emerging themes were 'racial
micro aggressions and stereotypings, failure to
recognise serious medical conditions due to skin
colour, lack of respect for culture and religion,
breaches of consent, and trauma'. Panel members
also shared their own experiences. They
highlighted that the case study showed that '"the
system was not built to support black and brown
people"' (36). Apparently there was also
discussion of colourism, having darker skin led to
the worst experiences, blame culture which
included fear of retribution for speaking out,
defensiveness and denial, and examples of how
exemptions set out in NHS trusts are often not
applied in relation to violence or destitution —
patients were not often notified about them, or
information about violence is not always shared
with overseas visitor managers, nor is the option
to write off debts or to avoid charges for
treatment. Racial profiling was discussed, so that
black women were subject to particular scrutiny in
a maternity unit close to an airport. Charging was
applied differently according to regional and age
variation, and there were no checks to prevent
discrimination against certain nationalities.
Particular findings from LGBTQ+ people
emerge that showed they were not being
particularly listened to, dismissed, treated with
lack of compassion, often a black pregnant person
being treated less seriously than a white partner.
People said they were 'racialised by the nature
and focus of questions asked by caregivers'. They
had a 'deep and persistent fear of death related
to "knowing and not knowing" the maternal
mortality statistics"' and the lack of knowledge
of healthcare professionals, and time pressures
which impacted on their personal care.
Interviewees did not feel comfortable disclosing
they were queer. They did feel more positive about
surviving birth, having a healthy baby, being
treated well by midwives and having a continuity
of care, however. The depth of fear was
particularly noticeable [rather odd – it seems to
be related to the need to build up some sort of
relationship between staff and patients, although
some said they were reprimanded for spending too
long on this]. Some felt that it was necessary to
have 'a vital antidote to the level of fear…
Celebrating black and brown birth… "The
amazingness of growing and nurturing our
families"'.
[Are non-white people more likely than white
people to experience fear? Everyone is pretty
scared, surely?]
The text for many from healthcare professional
bodies and focus groups underlined themes like the
NHS culture of blame and fear, lack of senior
representation, witnessing or experiencing overt
racism. The Royal College of Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists presented their work on training
and inclusivity and national audits. They revealed
that black and minority ethnic doctors in their
field have a significantly lower pass rate
compared to white peers. They welcomed the
explicit focus on racism, but emphasised action
not just research, disseminating urgent mandates
on how jaundice and sepsis can be diagnosed in
darker skin, engaging people who do not express
interest in antiracism, a common approach to the
medical curriculum, appointing more black and
Asian lay examiners, focusing on racism and
microaggressions. The Royal College of Midwives
has shared intelligence from other mixed ethnicity
midwives and support workers that they were more
likely to be disciplined work and receive harsher
outcomes, more likely to experience bullying and
undermining behaviours and less likely to be
promoted. They asked to ensure that antiracism
trainers are really experts 'not just a group of
passionate black and brown members' (40). For
them, cultural safety was crucial not just
cultural sensitivity, and the need to support
staff who were reporting bullying or harassment.
The Nursing and Midwifery Council highlighted
person centred care, human rights safety and
health. They pointed to lower acceptance rates
onto education courses for black and Asian
students, especially for overseas professionals
and recommended more research, improvements to
data, changes to overseas registration and
revalidation. The panel itself recommended more
emphasis on microaggressions and stereotypes,
mandateory antiracism training especially for
midwives, diverse imagery and specific language,
but not BAME, leadership targets, high-profile
examples of members who were 'not sufficiently
held to account for racist behaviour' (41). They
also published a specific case where a person had
made racially abusive comments about colleagues
and the original nursing and midwifery Council
panel agreed a suspension although she was
subsequently struck off.
The oral evidence sessions provided witnesses from
various places like the National Institute for
Health and Clinical excellence (NICE) and MBRRACE.
They review the NHS equity and equality guidelines
for maternity systems. Nice address their own
guidelines especially those that had singled out
black Asian and minority ethnic women for
particular induction programmes, which they had
finally dropped, following reaction that it was
'racist and discriminatory' (42). The panel
discussed how it had arisen and how the trust
might be rebuilt. MBRRACE presented their report
[as above] identified cardiovascular disease as
the leading cause of death in all ethnic groups,
and 'identified multiple microaggressions
experienced by women who died'. These included '…
Not being listened to… Agitation in women who did
not speak English… Attributed mental health
problems… A low pain threshold… Being called
difficult when hypoxic… Descriptions of women's
ethnic group in origins from generic terms such as
Afro-Caribbean to detailed country of birth…
Quality of interpretation and continued reliance
on interpretation by family members… Assumptions
around symptoms made on the basis of language
ability and/or ethnic group' (42 – 43) [so lots of
these are actually language or translation
problems that would affect any foreign women? Or
foreign men?]. Microaggressions occurred in all
ethnic groups most commonly in Asian women. Lack
of individual care was notable among black women
who died. There were research limitations and how
there might have been problems on identification
of microaggressions following limitations with
'representation among the coinvestigator group'
[unrepresentative white women?] (43). Numbers were
too small to compare nuances between ethnic
groups, and they were aggregated. They could work
only with medical records and on the care of women
who died. They also thought that '"defensive
writing"' in healthcare notes, and missing or
amended information raised suspicion that other
microaggressions or racist views and behaviours
'are not being recorded'. Nevertheless, this
analysis 'is powerful and correlates with the
findings on microaggressions in this inquiry's
evidence'.
Poll findings from 556 white respondents, 513
black, 227 Asian, 141 mixed ethnicity. 26% of
nonwhite respondents said English was not their
first language, 10% of white women.
[Quite a lot of people who might have difficulties
with English then?]
Those who gave birth in London were
overrepresented. 38 respondents said their gender
was not the same as the sex they were assigned at
birth. 'On the whole the majority of both groups
reported experiencing respect for maternity care'
(NB) (44). However these findings still 'underline
the inquiry's evidence in relation to choice,
informed decision-making, cultural needs and the
direct impact of race on care'.
Nonwhite women were more likely to report that
they felt uncomfortable when 'communicating their
cultural preferences or requests [more so if
English was not their first language?]… [and]
asking questions because they didn't want their
midwife or doctor to think they were being
difficult. Making decisions about their care
because they felt uneasy disagreeing with the care
options… recommended. Choosing where to give birth
as they were not given enough information to make
a decision'. One third of nonwhite women who
reported that they were treated poorly 'felt that
this was because of their race or ethnicity', four
times more likely to say this was the reason
compared to white women, and twice as likely to
feel it was because of their cultural background
and language [again differences if English was not
their first language?].
'Throughout the inquiry' black and brown people
did not feel safe. There were many stories 'that
depicted experiences of women feeling deeply
fearful'[more so than white people?] [A summary
findings says that this was the most prominent
theme with two thirds of people who shared their
stories describing not feeling safe 'some or all
of the time' and saying that 'racism and racial
discrimination had a direct impact on their sense
of safety' they claim that 'existing research
shows that black Asian and mixed ethnicity women
experienced far higher rates of unsafe outcomes
including death… [But]… Many black and brown
people do not feel safe during their care
regardless of clinical outcome' [so much of it is
irrational?]. Evidence was provided of serious
risks and actual harm as in the case studies
below. Concerns were not taken seriously,
life-threatening symptoms not spotted. Race was
never explicitly referenced, but many were left
thinking whether they 'they would have encountered
the same treatment had they been white'.
Case studies. One describes a Ghanaian person who
was discharged despite pain in the chest. It
turned out to be a blood clot in the lung. They
complained but their pain wasn't taken seriously.
Another African person describes a horrible birth
experience where a midwife minimised the concerns,
carried on with the paperwork and did not
recognise the symptoms of sepsis in the skin
because she was a black woman — her husband had to
go and find some blankets, severe pain was ignored
until a South Asian doctor noticed that her skin
was pale and she was eventually put on antibiotics
and gave birth just in time to treat her suspected
septicaemia. She thought that a white woman would
have been given pain relief but that the nurse
thought she was either strong enough or was
exaggerating (47).
There are multiple examples where jaundice had
been missed, 'which highlights how centring the
"white norm" in education and training directly
impacts on the safety of black and brown [people],
jeopardising their human rights.' One case study
shows her premature baby developed jaundice that
the health visitor could not see it until she
tested the levels and even then insisted the
machine was wrong, and the doctor agreed because
he could see nothing wrong despite a reading —
'the white staff did not recognise jaundice in a
black baby' (48). There were other reports of
birth injuries, tears, stitches, infections,
haemorrhage and long-term incontinence, just under
1/3 had neonatal complications risking the baby's
life and involving intensive care. 12 testimonies
described baby loss. Solicitors and barristers
testified on the devastating consequences. Others
talked about negligent care and its effects on
babies outcomes. One Afghani woman was denied pain
relief and she ultimately had a stillbirth. A
British woman of African descent had poor care and
again a stillbirth. A black woman was denied her
choice of cesarean and she and her baby nearly
died — in each case lawyers were involved in these
cases and 'felt that race was a contributing
factor to the mismanagement of these women's
care'.
Psychological safety is also critical, and again
fear can lead to long-term trauma. It can also
lead to feeling unable to raise concerns. One
person felt that they were going to be just
another black statistic. Others were shouted at or
threatened with reprisals if complaints were made.
Fear and lack of control 'are strongly associated
with PTSD' (49). A patient felt that the doctor
did not provide informed consent and shouted at
them during an examination resulting in anxiety
about the intentions of staff and wanting to be
discharged as soon as possible.
Over half of the respondents [overall?] gave an
example of being ignored or disbelieved and many
reported concerns about the provision of care. In
particular 'that their pain was dismissed or
minimised… There was evidence that the failure to
listen to black and brown [people] was at least in
part a consequence of racism'. (52) 'in some
examples… The racial element was explicit and the
role of racist stereotypes in creating a culture…
Was obvious'. One midwife spoke about racist
stereotypes in a belief that Asian women can't
handle pain and make a fuss so did not receive
pain relief. Another midwife swapped stories with
other ethnic minority parents about lacking pain
relief. A Sikh woman was ignored asking about
their baby feeding properly and felt she was
probably stereotyped because of the turban she was
wearing. A common experience was being denied pain
relief 'due to staff not believing they were in
labour' (53) [soon dispelled, surely].
A case study of a Chinese woman says she was
discharged even after contractions had started and
she was in severe pain but the staff were angry
even though she was dilated. Another one was still
in pain even after an epidural and not believed
that it wasn't working. A third one wanted
painkillers because the stitches were not
dissolving and were infected. They found cases
where concerns were raised but fears were
dismissed or belittled even though significant
harm could have been avoided if they will listen
to. In one case a black African woman had been in
pain for hours despite requesting help and pain
relief and was eventually treated for internal
bleeding, while another one was reported as having
a cold baby, but this was ignored until it was
finally realised that it was not responding.
Another case study concerned misdiagnosis of
jaundice which led to brain damage.
[Do we know the ethicity/race of the racists
here?]
Racist attitudes and behaviours by caregivers —
'stereotypes, micro-aggressions and assumptions
about risk… are having a serious detrimental
effect on people's maternity experiences'. Two
thirds of respondents felt that. 31% of nonwhite
respondents said they were treated poorly and that
this was 'because of their race or ethnicity' [the
shortfall — 35% — is made up by those who say it
was race or religion]. 'Crucially, it is the
persistent and prolonged exposure to
micro-aggressions that causes harm' (56) [not sure
there is much evidence specifically for this, and
not sure how it links to cardiovascular causes for
death].
Almost half the respondents said that racist
attitudes led to distress and trauma. They define
micro-aggressions as '"the everyday verbal,
non-verbal, and environmental slights, snubs, or
insults, whether intentional or unintentional,
which communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative
messages to target persons based solely upon their
marginalised group membership' (57) [referenced to
Sue, D, undated, Microaggression: more than
just race — I have looked it up]. They may
not be consciously racist but they show
'thoughtlessness' and the centring of white
perspectives as the norm. One example is 'failing
to learn the correct pronunciation of someone's
name'. Using this terminology can still 'obscure
and minimise the damage it causes' but we are
still talking about 'forms of racism'.
Stereotypes can be damaging and lead to degrading
treatment and risk 'due to dangerous racist
misconceptions' where even seemingly small areas
can have serious consequences. There were 'a
multitude of accounts' where Asian women were
referred to as '"princesses" or "precious" and
black women as "aggressive" or "angry"'. There
were 'multiple reports' of professionals asking
where are you from, not trying to pronounce names
correctly, misidentifying people based on
assumptions of race or ethnicity. In one case, a
sonographer did not doublecheck a name and the
wrong scan was performed: the patient was blamed.
Sometimes 'direct incorrect assumptions' were made
about educational status, domestic violence,
marital status '(as in assuming black women are
single mothers), Muslim women having lots of
children, and hijab wearing women not being able
to speak English'. There were frequent reports of
feeling patronised and othered. These testimonies
were supported by recent reviews by MBRRACE.
Sometimes there were positive stereotypes but
which 'can still have a negative impact', like
assuming that black or brown women would know how
to breastfeed or would have lots of family
support, would just know what they are doing, and
this sometimes led to difficulties getting support
from staff and adequate postnatal support. Staff
often thought they were treating everyone the same
or were colourblind.
'There were many accounts' where people were put
into high-risk categories 'due to factors relating
to ethnicity' and were 'medicalised', not always
based on 'observed medical indications'
[which contradicts the bit about being put at
risk?].
This meant choices were sometimes reduced e.g.
about inducing birth, or racist outcomes with care
or policy about inducing births with ethnicity as
a reason, 'oversurveillance' [can't have it both
ways]. There was an 'invisibility/hyper-
visibility paradox' — bodies are pathologised, but
own views about their care are not heard. [Some
stories seemed ridiculous], like a midwife who
thought that black women do not bruise. All of
this could lead to serious consequences like not
picking up sepsis.
The problem might lie with training and how the
curriculum centres on the white body — all the
textbooks are based on white men, it seems
[written by white men?]. All the Colleges seem to
agree about the need to decolonise education and
guidance and to investigate conditions that affect
certain ethnic groups in a way that does not
pathologise them [very tricky I would have
thought]. There should be more emphasis on
cultural safety. Apparently, New Zealand does
better. Cultural insensitivities failures should
be addressed, like being asked about cultural or
religious needs, which had led to complaints from
14% of nonwhite women, including ridiculing
'cultural maternity practices' [a case study
turned on the availability of halal milk, and
another wanted to follow traditional Chinese
customs and not shower immediately after delivery
— even at the risk of sepsis?]. This is
'disrespectful practice' which actually
contravenes much of the guidance.
There were some incidents of overt racism. One
Ecuadorian woman was told that she would need to
learn English if she wanted to live in this
country. Another was told she must give her baby
the BCG vaccine because she was from Africa and
therefore liable to exposure to TB, because people
from Africa and minorities '"live together"'. Some
professionals said colleagues thought black women
and babies have thicker skin, the ward smelt of
curry when South Asian families were being cared
for, that Chinese people are dirty. Others
reported favouritism for white women such as being
allowed visitors out of hours, receiving better
care being granted more time for questions and
extended more patience.
Nonwhite people are more subject to dehumanisation
— 'disrespect, rudeness and lack of empathy… Not
being seen as an individual or even as human'.
Shared stories picked on 'a pervasive lack of
curiosity or empathy, harsh or rough treatment,
and even shouting and threats' (62) [more than
anyone else?]. There was an embedded view that
black bodies don't work in the correct way, there
was a problem with African pelvises [apparently
taught on a midwifery course] that black women are
more likely to have diabetes or high blood
pressure because of the food they eat and the
weight they carry. They are also somehow,
contradictorily, tougher and able to endure more
pain — 'racist stereotypes which have their origin
in slavery and eugenicist theory' [reference to a
fact sheet on scientific racism from the National
Human Genome Research Institute]. So one black
woman was told that she didn't need pain relief
and advised not to make some much noise, Asian
women by contrast were reported that they were
precious less able to tolerate pain.
Many reported they were subjected to a lack of
basic dignity and respect, rudeness, and a failure
to honour cultural practices or requests, made to
feel like a burden, subjected to shouting, 'eye
rolling' and even overt threats — in one case
after sleeping with the baby [she was threatened
with a report to social services]. There was
'intrusive or aggressive questioning during
intimate procedures'(63), like being asked about
immigration status 'while partially undressed'.
One woman was refused a bedpan — '"I'm not
absolutely sure [if it was because of my skin
colour] but after that incident, I felt really sad
during the labour"'. They ask themselves whether
they would be subject to the same treatment if
they were white [and has the Report done anything
to reassure them on this ground?].
There were reports of poor care, lack of
information about care, insensitive attitudes in
stillbirth or injury cases, and bias compared to
records in white women's maternity notes,
according to lawyers — for example dismissive
correspondence between midwives over mothers'
feelings after bereavement, one case when a mother
was left without support of any kind overnight. A
case study reported being left for hours after a
booking mistake even though they had paid for a
private room, and even after admission, being
refused re-entrance to their private room.
There were violations of the right to informed
consents, sometimes for medical procedures. There
was some use of 'coercion and obstetric violence'
and lack of choice about care (66). 'These
findings reveal a maternity service struggling to
serve [people] or to support its staff. They are
not unique to [nonwhite women] as we have seen
from the Ockenden report. However, they are even
more dangerous when combined with systemic racism
as they reinforce inequalities and cement feelings
that [nonwhite women]… Are unsafe'. A lawyer says
that it is crucial that risks are explained and
understood 'no matter what language you speak',
but a majority of written testimonies said this
did not happen, and there were some very serious
cases, including failure to gain consent for
medical procedures. Patients were told that medics
just needed to do something. In one case, a
patient had specifically requested not to have an
injection to assist with the afterbirth, but was
given one anyway [seems to be an induction
procedure?] In a legal case, a solicitor requested
no male staff and female interpreters, but this
was denied, and a family member used instead which
'led to a lack of informed consent for vaginal
birth' (67). There are many examples of women who
did not have access to an interpreter or adequate
translation services.
Many women were denied choice by not having the
options explained to them in a way they
understood. They were given tick boxes. They were
not asked about cultural needs. 'When I asked for
pain relief it was not given. I did not have
options for place of birth discussed' and
sometimes 'choices were actively undermined or
refused' (68). Some preferences were resisted —
'e.g. to be induced, to have a cesarean, or not
give birth at home'. In one case study a request
for home birth was dismissed because the woman was
told she would need an induction. A discussion of
the options was delayed and she was still
pressured by daily phone calls to come in for an
induction. Another one made a birth plan and told
midwives but at this request ignored 'which caused
her significant distress' [does sound a bit
precious].
Obstetric violence was described in the evidence
and was experienced by nonwhite people 'on
multiple occasions' [same one on multiple
occasions, or multiple people on one occasion?]
Who 'felt their ethnicity caused or played a
significant factor in the scenarios' (69). One of
the most common examples was vaginal examinations
— a case study reports unprofessional conduct, no
sympathy, and a belief that the reaction was
commonly linked to her race, and aggressive
nature, disbelief at signs of comfort and pain, a
common attitude that she has come to learn is
prevalent and based on a view that non-white women
do not feel pain. [Sounds a bit pre-theorised].
Another close study refers to a lack of consent
for three pregnancies, bullying, misinformation, a
presumption that she was uneducated and naïve,
being left battered and bruised, a late
miscarriage as a result of domestic violence, not
knowing who the men were who put their hands in
her [really?] — they did not bother to introduce
themselves and she now knows they were doctors but
she was terrified bruised and battered. She used
private midwives for the last two kids and an
entirely different experience with consent care
and safety. In other cases, women were forced to
undergo interventions that they had explicitly not
consented to — like forceps delivery — 'she was
literally pinned down'(69)
'Verbal and psychological coercion was also
commonplace'especially if women gave birth outside
the guidelines — having a birth partner and doula
there despite the pandemic, for example, being
pressured for an induction, waiting 48 hours after
the waters had broken [some sort of non-medical
advice?]. Some did not have a consistent midwife.
Others had very busy midwives. Others had a
racially discriminatory midwife and could not
change them.
Turning to structural barriers, the main one
seemed to be 'respectful and non-discriminatory
maternity care: lack of access to interpreting
services and the impact of NHS charging'. (72)
These pose serious risks to those nonwhite women
who have English as a second language or have
refugee and migrant or asylum seeker status. The
lack of interpretation services was a common
theme. Trusts have a duty of care to ensure
effective communication. One woman was told
interpreting was too expensive. Many stories
referred to inappropriate methods such as Google
Translate or using relatives. Accurate history is
sometimes difficult, especially if there is a
'huge cultural sensitivity' about matters such as
TB in Somalia, where 'it is thought to be a
disease of poverty' (73) [so people do not
disclose]. Lack of interpretation appears in
'multiple examples of legal cases'. In one case
study that went to law, a baby suffered a brain
injury as a result of lack of feeding support
because there was no interpretation services — the
NHS lost the case because they had not adequately
recorded the details.
The charging scheme discriminated against some
women. Some were racially profiled and this led to
women disengaging. In one case, a woman was denied
early treatment unless she paid upfront, others
were asked for hundreds or thousands of pounds for
routine care, were often told incorrect
information about payment and entitlement, even if
they were asylum seekers. There was often no
specialist care like a diabetic clinic in places
where certain ethnic groups who were liable were
concentrated. They were poor governance pathways,
for example in recording ethnicity and other
demographics, clinical policy is not based on
evidence, inflexibility for appointment times,
limited resources in other languages like
information leaflets and antenatal education.
Tiredness and burnout can cause uncivil behaviour
and in those circumstances 'unaddressed prejudice
and racism are more likely to surface' (77). 70%
of healthcare professionals who submitted written
evidence identified as nonwhite, 25% as white, the
majority as midwives. Almost all of them said that
systematic racism or racial discrimination is
contributing to maternity outcomes and experiences
[so they are accepting blame themselves or blaming
others?]
There was a toxic culture, as in other reports
like on Morecambe or the Ockenden report on
Shrewsbury [where white people were mostly the
victims?]. Kindness and compassion went missing,
blame and bullying was common, and many
respondents agreed. Midwives reported feeling
bullied and disrespected. Black midwives spoke of
mistrust including lack of trust towards the
Nursing and Midwifery Council and disproportionate
sanctions against nonwhite members who go through
the process [of review of fitness to practice] —
it was often used as a threat by management to
revoke their status. The NHS was seen as too
hierarchical. Student midwives often experienced
racism in clinical placement, sometimes overtly
racist comments. Nonwhite midwives often spoke
about leaving all wishing to leave as a result of
'experiencing or witnessing racism' (79), but some
felt unable to speak up, while those who did
reported having to leave or facing harassment,
being othered, not supported by universities, not
being taken seriously.
Nonwhite people face a white ceiling,
underrepresentation at board level. This has led
to a lack of safety and reporting racism to white
managers, especially as they are sometimes
described as playing the race card, being
oversensitive. There are no 'robust impartial
mechanisms to report racism' (80) [reports like
this don't really help either]. Black students
fail more often and are less likely to be
promoted. They lack role models, they feel
comfortable only with other ethnic minority staff
like Asian doctors or black obstetricians.
There are positive accounts of maternity care which
mention 'good communication, person centred and
culturally sensitive care'. Some birthing people
described these positive experiences and gave
examples of excellent care — one in 10 written
testimonies reported good care (82) even with
accounts that mention poor experiences there was
still examples of good care sometimes at least one
professional who was '"amazing"'. In the poll,
'most [nonwhite] respondents described positive
experiences. 52% strongly agreed and 32% somewhat
agreed that they were treated with respect… 50%
strongly agreed and 37% somewhat agreed that they
were spoken to in a kind and friendly way' (82).
Some case studies report this — brilliant
experience clear explanation brilliant
interpreters, appropriate translations open and
honest dialogue is being shown kindness and
consideration. A midwife described good carers
listening to people respecting their choices,
giving evidence having diverse staff not assuming
Western ideas are always best, proper training for
racist behaviours, reporting colleagues without
fear practising people's names asking people about
cultural practices. Others reported respecting
religious or cultural preferences, like not
assigning male doctors to Muslim women,
facilitating post birth ceremonies for Sikhs,
trying to access halal meals, focusing on person
centred care with people with specific histories,
having kind and respectful conversations in
recommending alternative birth plans. There are
also good practice initiatives in various
practices, sometimes involving liaison is with
ethnic minority partnerships.
One particularly thorough approach is provided by
National Childbirth Trust, whose training is
provided by the University of Worcester who do a
thorough programme on diversity and inclusion,
working with and inclusion charity, paying
attention to their language and practice, and even
conducting their own research on the experiences
of students from nonwhite backgrounds.
As a result they propose actions for the maternity
system:
1. Commit to be an antiracist organisation. This
means 'robust mandatory training on antiracism and
at least annually, clear standards on racism and
discrimination, proper reporting to ensure the
safety of the person experiencing racism, a
feedback culture that does not blame the person
experiencing racism, follow-up on reports of
racism, and organisationwide racial equity plan
with tracking and metrics [racism police]
2. Decolonise maternity curriculums and guidance.
Same antiracism training and embedding of
antiracism and cultural safety. Wholesale review
of education exams training and guidance 'to
ensure the white bodies not centred as the norm'
and variations are understood 'without
pathologising black and brown bodies', more
diversity for guideline groups, better assessments
to include the impact of stereotyping and
microaggression, proper care for nonwhite people
3. Make [nonwhite people] decision-makers in their
care, putting nonwhite people in
control of their care and respecting their
dignity [vague], improving their communication
gathering feedback rebuilding trust, continuity
of care, right to change caregiver, investing in
'meaningful co production through policy-making'
(92), targets for inclusive participation, and
accountability mechanism with community
representatives [all very vague and jobs worthy]
4. Create safe inclusive workforce cultures build a
culture of care well-being and mentorship, set
specific targets to increase representation,
establish trauma informed teams of link
lecturers, mandatory training on trauma informed
practice and therapeutic supervision, do not
allow bullying and racism with 'named paid
roles', address stress-related sickness, develop
positive workforce cultural initiatives to be
measured by the Care Quality Commission
5. Dismantle structural barriers to racial
equity through national policy change end NHS
charging, invest in the NHS interpreting
services, any ethnicity gap in maternal deaths,
get more data, use better data to calculate
staffing need, for example to allow extra time
for language barriers and cultural and social
needs.
Notes on methodology. The online call for
evidence was posted on survey monkey, translated
into 16 languages, 10 largely open-ended questions
allowing participants to tell their story while
supporting 'consistent analysis and identification
of themes.
'This inquiry was
not designed to be a formal academic study,
although we have drawn on both research and
community participation methods'. 'We are unable
to control for other factors that can influence
worst outcomes and experiences in maternity
care, such as pre-existing conditions or social
determinants of health. Our starting point that
systemic racism exists and explicit questions to
test this hypothesis could generate confirmation
bias. The design could also reflect our
subjective perspective as Birthrights and
individuals with their own lived and
professional experiences. As the sample was
self-selecting, it is likely that were more
likely to hear from people with poor experiences
and outcomes including racism. We sought to
mitigate this by framing questions neutrally,
including explicit questions about positive
experiences, and conducting the wider poll of
over 1000 women including a control group of
white women. For the online call for evidence we
did not collect other demographics such as
gender, sexual orientation or whether someone
had a disability which limited the scope to
explore intersectional discrimination. There
were no responses in other languages… The online
format required access to a computer or smart
phone and a sufficient level of computer
literacy. This means the design excluded the
voices of the most marginalised people… Though
we sought to deliver a UK wide call for evidence
there were limited responses from Scotland and
Northern Ireland. Notwithstanding these
limitations, we believe the findings bring the
voices of black, brown and mixed ethnicity women
and birthing people to the fore in a way that
other research does not. As such the inquiry as
a powerful contribution so the discussion on how
to urgently improve racial equality within
maternity care' (98 – 99)
|
|